4 Comments
User's avatar
Joe Haas's avatar

Shocking but I read that he was not adjusting well to Carnell's offense which did not position him in the center. I hate to see us bolster a rival but if the Union do something with the cash, that could be good. Might this mean for playing time for Cavan Sullivan or giving Quinn Sullivan a chance to be our #10?

Expand full comment
Kimberly Root's avatar

I have appreciated what Gazdag contributed earlier but he seems to have had an attitude of some kind last year and after a brief good start and a goal v Miami, not seemed in sync. I watched him with Hungarian national team too and saw similar: flashes but not sustained good play. Hope the best for him. Hope we can “do something” (a delco dad - not related to me - used to shout this at our kids’ games) with the money.

Expand full comment
George H.'s avatar

Agree with Tanner on this one. I felt like Gazdag was overpaid at this current salary, but Tanner was right to pass at the $3M per year request. Plus, he's got a lot of miles on those legs so I think his drop off in production will come sooner.

I'm interested to see what the actual transfer fee was.

Great reporting, Joe.

Expand full comment
Thomas Mallee's avatar

Good move considering the contract situation. Gazdag has looked lost in this new Carnell formation he was really bad the last game. He was out of position many times during the match drifting to his old 10 position .

Expand full comment